[22822] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: aads renumbering rumor and implications
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (bmanning@vacation.karoshi.com)
Mon Jan 25 19:26:21 1999
From: bmanning@vacation.karoshi.com
To: rirving@onecall.net
Date: Mon, 25 Jan 1999 16:05:12 -0800 (PST)
Cc: alan@globalcenter.net, nanog@merit.edu
In-Reply-To: <36ACA21C.9F20666A@onecall.net> from "Richard Irving" at Jan 25, 99 11:55:56 am
> Unless someone knows differently, the renumbering at AADS been called
> off.
> (Enough people signed up to pay for the space, independent of AADS
> operations)
>
> At least, this is true according to Bill Manning.
>
> (As if *he* knows anything ;)
>
> . Ciaou .
Indeed. The view from here is that one of the participants at the
AADS exchange agreed to sign the acceptable use paperwork, which was
the gist of the problem I had with the current situation. That taken
care of, the prefix 198.32.130.0/24 is good for use at the AADS
exchange. This does not preclude AADS from implementing a renumbering
plan for its clients. It is then up to the clients to determine which/
how many prefixes they intend to use.
Also note. There is -NOT- payment for address space. There are costs
associated with doing delegation and those costs have to be recovered
somewhere.
