[22494] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: IGP Comparison (Summary of Responses)
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Tony Li)
Wed Jan 6 05:10:41 1999
To: SEAN@SDG.DRA.COM (Sean Donelan)
cc: nanog@merit.edu
From: Tony Li <tli@juniper.net>
Date: 06 Jan 1999 09:56:51 +0000
In-Reply-To: SEAN@SDG.DRA.COM's message of 6 Jan 99 03:13:18 GMT
SEAN@SDG.DRA.COM (Sean Donelan) writes:
> If you didn't have an installed base, and didn't already know one or
> the other, which would you choose? Or just punt, and use iBGP....
I'm only slightly biased, but...
Having implemented IS-IS; having listened to a certain former IS-IS
implementor gripe greviously about the fun he was having implementing OSPF;
having watched both successful and unsuccesful OSPF implementations;
knowing what I know about both protocols, and given Murphy's tendency to
veer towards complexity, my decision would take less time than an SPF. ;-)
Tony
