|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| home | help | back | first | fref | pref | prev | next | nref | lref | last | post |
To: k claffy <kc@caida.org> cc: nanog@merit.edu, gherbert@crl.com Date: Wed, 23 Dec 1998 20:00:29 -0800 From: George Herbert <gherbert@crl.com> K wrote: [useful summary of gigabit ether situation] >Steve also made exclnt point that the ATM vs 'promiscuous' medium > have other inherent distinction of potential interest > to ISPs with policy/privacy/security concerns I'm not quite sure I understand this bit; isn't switched ether (of any speed) equally secure as an ATM switch would be? -george william herbert gherbert@crl.com I speak only for myself
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| home | help | back | first | fref | pref | prev | next | nref | lref | last | post |