[22216] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Question about NANOG charter
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Hui-Hui Hu)
Mon Dec 14 20:09:52 1998
From: hhui@arcfour.com (Hui-Hui Hu)
To: Bradley Reynolds <brad@null0.qual.net>
cc: nanog@merit.edu
In-reply-to: Your message of "Mon, 14 Dec 1998 19:37:59 GMT."
<Pine.BSF.4.05.9812141934490.4832-100000@null0.qual.net>
Date: Mon, 14 Dec 1998 16:48:54 -0800
IMNSHO -
NANOG is not a NOC, and end-users are 99% of the time going
to be much happier if they call their upstreams directly.
Also many many people mistake NANOG for inet-access or
com-priv or cisco-nsp (myself included, often).
Back to normal life
-h
: As a general question, is this mailing list concerned with the
: operation of end nodes? It was always my thought that network
: operations covered the ether between end nodes.
: I don't want to start a big debate, though I would prefer a public
: answer by a clued party.
