[2221] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: UUNET stops peering at MAE-West
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Kent W. England)
Sun Mar 24 21:11:15 1996
Date: Sun, 24 Mar 1996 17:50:20 -0800
To: Mark Kent <mark@MainStreet.Net>
From: "Kent W. England" <kwe@6SigmaNets.com>
Cc: nanog@merit.edu
At 12:07 AM 3/24/96 -0800, Mark Kent wrote:
>>> Why haven't more networks taken advantage of the PacBell NAP facility
>>> in San Francisco??
>
>I should note that I don't see any issues going over the SF NAP from
>my neck of the woods.
>
>-mark
>
Give it a try. Pacific Bell has upgraded the Bay Area NAP to Stratacom BPX
ATM switches and the new PacBell LA NAP will also be a BPX switch. These
switches have sufficient buffer size to manage OC-3 connections.
Check out our NAP stats page http://www.PacBell.COM/Products/NAP/Stats/ to
see how much aggregate traffic is already flowing through the Bay Area NAP.
Still some headroom left and no cell loss!
--Kent
