[22049] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Lawsuit threat against RBL users
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Stephen Stuart)
Fri Dec 4 13:37:45 1998
To: nanog@merit.edu
In-reply-to: Your message of "Fri, 04 Dec 1998 12:25:55 EST."
<3.0.32.19981204120107.00bfc118@odie.av8.com>
Date: Fri, 04 Dec 1998 09:45:50 -0800
From: Stephen Stuart <stuart@tech.org>
> Hasn't the operational value of this discussion been exhausted?
Yes; in fact, a separate list was created to handle it:
> Message-ID: <19981120161543.A21268@puck.nether.net>
> Date: Fri, 20 Nov 1998 16:15:43 -0500
> From: Jared Mauch <jared@puck.nether.net>
> To: nanog@merit.edu
> Subject: rbl-discuss@puck.nether.net
> Reply-To: rbl-discuss@puck.nether.net
>
>
> new mailing list out there.
>
> rbl-discuss@puck.nether.net
>
> for discussion of rbl type filtering, consequences, etc.
>
> to get on:
>
> send mail to rbl-discuss-request@puck.nether.net
>
> subject: subscribe
>
> to get off:
>
> (insert pun here)
>
> send mail to rbl-discuss-request@puck.nether.net
>
> subject: unsubscribe
>
> --
> Jared Mauch | pgp key available via finger from
> jared@puck.nether.net
> clue++; | http://puck.nether.net/~jared/
Will everyone who wants to keep the RBL discussion alive *please* go
there?
Stephen
