[22001] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Black Hole Vixie/RBL
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Steven J. Sobol)
Tue Dec 1 15:32:45 1998
Date: Tue, 1 Dec 1998 14:54:02 -0500
From: "Steven J. Sobol" <sjsobol@nacs.net>
To: Dean Robb <pceasy@norfolk.infi.net>
Cc: Dean Anderson <dean@av8.com>, nanog@merit.edu
In-Reply-To: <3.0.6.32.19981201121851.007b6cb0@norfolk.infi.net>; from Dean Robb on Tue, Dec 01, 1998 at 12:18:51PM -0500
On Tue, Dec 01, 1998 at 12:18:51PM -0500, Dean Robb wrote:
> At 13:06 11/30/98 -0500, you wrote:
> >
> >BBBZZZTTT yourself. Blocking email is an interception under the ECPA (18
> >USC 2511 et al). It has been reported here previously that
>
> *Sigh*...again with the misquoting of the law. First READ the law in
> question, then supply a Court opinion that blocking is interception (since
> it's the courts that interpret the law) if you still disagree.
Dean^2,
This exact discussion has played out at least once or twice before on NANOG.
Please go read the archives. I think at this point, no matter who is right,
the argument is a waste of bandwidth.
Both of you are receiving two-minute penalties. Go sit in the penalty box
and chill. :>
--
Steve Sobol [sjsobol@nacs.net]
Part-time Support Droid [support@nacs.net]
NACS Spaminator [abuse@nacs.net]
Spotted on a bumper sticker: "Possum. The other white meat."
