[2190] in North American Network Operators' Group

home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post

Re: Address "portability"

daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Bill Manning)
Thu Mar 21 16:42:07 1996

From: bmanning@isi.edu (Bill Manning)
To: kozowski@structured.net (Eric Kozowski)
Date: Thu, 21 Mar 1996 13:13:31 -0800 (PST)
Cc: nanog@merit.edu
In-Reply-To: <199603210615.WAA04700@chaos.structured.net> from "Eric Kozowski" at Mar 20, 96 10:15:01 pm

> 
> 
> What is the general consensus of this group regarding the "portability" of 
> addresses in the 204/8 and 205/8 range?  
> 

	All address prefixes are portable. Their routability by any
	given transit provider is always suspect and varies from time
	to time.
	This nomenclature has been foisted on the unsuspecting by well
	intentioned people. This idea fosters the myth of global 
	reachability for any given prefix.

-- 
--bill

home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post