[21891] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: NSI policy on lame delagations
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Patrick Greenwell)
Sun Nov 22 17:50:24 1998
Date: Sun, 22 Nov 1998 14:28:01 -0800 (PST)
From: Patrick Greenwell <patrick@namesecure.com>
To: Randy Bush <randy@psg.com>
cc: nanog@merit.edu
In-Reply-To: <m0zhdCf-000013C@roam.psg.com>
On Sun, 22 Nov 1998, Randy Bush wrote:
> >>> The greater issue is that there is any implementation at all, when there
> >>> was none previously.
> >> your assertion is widely known to be false.
> > Thank you for your extremely helpful answer. Once again, since when has
> > NSI been enforcing such a policy?
>
> isi enforced it. sri enforced it. nsi enforced it when they took over from
> sri. that they did not test for correct practice for a while does not make
> incorrect practice valid.
Who said anything about incorrect practices? My question was when did NSI
begin enforcing the policy. I am not upset at the lame delagation policy
at all. I am all for it.
> welcome to the network slobs' mailing list. where we winge and make excuses
> for half-assed practices, and excoriate and hurl innuendo at those who try
> to ensure correct practice.
Indeed. When are you going to stop?
/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\
Patrick Greenwell (800) 299-1288 v
CTO (925) 377-1212 v
NameSecure (925) 377-1414 f
Coming to the ISPF-II? The Forum for ISPs by ISPs http://www.ispf.com
\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/
