[21818] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: NSI policy on lame delagations
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Patrick Greenwell)
Sun Nov 22 01:46:11 1998
Date: Sat, 21 Nov 1998 11:58:40 -0800 (PST)
From: Patrick Greenwell <patrick@namesecure.com>
To: Michael Dillon <michael@memra.com>
cc: nanog@merit.edu
In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSI.3.93.981121095606.17390B-100000@sidhe.memra.com>
On Sat, 21 Nov 1998, Michael Dillon wrote:
> On Fri, 20 Nov 1998, Patrick Greenwell wrote:
>
> > While an interesting statement in philosophy, I fail to understand the
> > practical applicability of your advice in real world operations.
>
> The practical applicability is that you should always set up nameservice
> for a new domain and then send in the Internic application. With the
> automated systems that most ISPs are using these days it should be no
> problem to do this. There is no good technical reason to wait until a
> domain registration is processed before setting up nameservice.
Great advice Michael. We already do that.
Again, my question is specifically *when* did NSI begin enforcing a lame
delegation policy? On another mailing list NSI is now saying that they
will apply this policy if someone listed a provider nameservers without
their permission, however myself and others on our staff have been told on
more than one occasion by NSI that there was nothing they could do in
these instances.
/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\
Patrick Greenwell (800) 299-1288 v
CTO (925) 377-1212 v
NameSecure (925) 377-1414 f
Coming to the ISPF-II? The Forum for ISPs by ISPs http://www.ispf.com
\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/
