[21655] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Cache-as-cache-can
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Paul Vixie)
Tue Nov 17 19:20:07 1998
To: nanog@merit.edu
From: Paul Vixie <paul@vix.com>
Date: 17 Nov 1998 15:56:09 -0800
In-Reply-To: stevenh@inet.unisource.nl's message of 17 Nov 1998 08:42:05 -0800
stevenh@inet.unisource.nl (steven hessing) writes:
> There seem to be three solutions for transparent web-caching:
> 1 a web-cache between two routers, all traffic is routed through it.
> 2 a l4 switch between two routers, all traffic is routed through it.
> The l4 switch redirects web-requests to a www-cache.
> 3 a web-cache connected to a router which uses policy routing to
> direct web-requests to it.
There's a fourth. I used to manufacture something called the Web Gateway
Interceptor which was topologically a router. It wasn't competitive as
a router, either in price, performance, or number/kind of interfaces. But
you could put it in parallel with another router and integrate it into
your OSPF mesh and use OSPF link costs to make it be the primary path only
while it was up. HSRP would have worked the same way, and I'll admit that
it's a lot simpler to do (though I'm not sure it's an open standard yet?)
--
Paul Vixie <paul@vix.com>
