[21361] in North American Network Operators' Group
RE: WCCP talk..
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Christian Kuhtz)
Thu Nov 12 14:53:27 1998
From: "Christian Kuhtz" <ck@adsu.bellsouth.com>
To: "Jesper Skriver" <jesper@skriver.dk>, <alex@nac.net>
Cc: <nanog@merit.edu>
Date: Wed, 11 Nov 1998 19:55:59 -0500
In-Reply-To: <19981111092325.B2401@skriver.dk>
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
> On Tue, Nov 10, 1998 at 11:05:00PM -0500, alex@nac.net wrote:
> > That I can accept.
> >
> > But, I still have one fundamental argument, which is to ensure
true and
> > absolute reliability, a machine should not be verifying its own
health.
> >
> > My other concern is that now that it is licensable, will the other
cache
> > manufacturers do it properly also?
If cisco has any brains left, they will certify WCCP operation in a
series of testsuites before they let anyone claim that it is WCCP.
> Do you have a link or similar that shows that WCCP is now licensable
?
It has not been announced yet.
> Does any know of any other cache manufacturers that currently
supports
> WCCP ?
WCCP licensing is, AFAIK, not yet available.
Cheers,
Chris
- --
Christian Kuhtz <ck@adsu.bellsouth.com> -wk ck@gnu.org -hm
Sr. Network Architect, BellSouth Corp., Advanced Data Services
NOTE: "We speak PGP: key available at well-known key servers."
"Turnaucka's Law: The attention span of a computer
is only as long as its electrical cord."
-- /usr/games/fortune
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: PGPfreeware 6.0 for non-commercial use <http://www.pgp.com>
iQA/AwUBNkoyDIRXnO1Cm58sEQIU6gCg7tl2LocA0LkLA1TVK8IUiECjY8sAniD8
drSK+t1Wzev2X7i53RyuzjVZ
=1CYs
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
