[21327] in North American Network Operators' Group

home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post

Re: gateway failover.

daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Deepak Jain)
Wed Nov 11 15:48:10 1998

Date: Wed, 11 Nov 1998 15:01:23 -0500 (EST)
From: Deepak Jain <deepak@ai.net>
To: spam@eek.org
cc: nanog@merit.edu
In-Reply-To: <19981110205948.Z6590@sfx.com>


Solaris boxes support IRDP out of the box, as do Ciscos.

I do not know what their failover time is by default, but I am sure that 
can addressed reasonably easily.

-Deepak.

On Tue, 10 Nov 1998 spam@eek.org wrote:

> i've a situation where the network we're building is 
> very low-traffic, but requires maximum uptime. the 
> budget is for all components to be duplicated to
> allow for failover. 
> 
> i've figured out various ways to do load-balancing and 
> failover at the router/nat level, and at L2, but have run 
> into a bit of a problem figuring how to use two solaris 
> boxes (firewalls) as gateways for all servers/clients 
> behind them in some kind of HA/failover configuration. 
> 
> i'd like to minimize the client/server side configuration 
> as much as possible (and the environment may include 
> NT, Macs, or other such ilk which will not easily supporting 
> a useful routing protocol), so something like installing gated 
> on all of the boxes, and implementing an ospf environment
> is an unsavory proposition. 
> 
> i'd like something like HSRP, but for solaris/unix, and preferably
> free.
> 
> i'm aware of several vendor HA solutions, but they are mostly 
> overkill for our application. i've looked into IRDP (rfc1256), 
> but i cant find any information about vendor support.
> 
> any pointers to relevant info would be appreciated, including
> any general resources for HA/network redundancy/failover stuff
> (preferably non-commercial). 
> 
> -foo
> 
> 

home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post