| home | help | back | first | fref | pref | prev | next | nref | lref | last | post |
To: John.Fraizer@EnterZone.Net (John Fraizer) Date: Tue, 10 Nov 1998 20:01:45 -0500 (EST) Cc: nanog@merit.edu In-Reply-To: <3.0.32.19981110195522.00740fcc@pop3.enterzone.net> from "John Fraizer" at Nov 10, 98 07:55:23 pm From: Jeff Mcadams <jeffm@iglou.com> Thus spake John Fraizer >At 06:58 PM 11/10/98 -0500, Jeff Mcadams wrote: >>Here I disagree. As I (and others have pointed out) there are people >>with /32's that have just as much administrative control over their IP >>"space" as someone with a /25 might have. I have *several* customers, >>and we're not all that big of an ISP, that have *full* administrative >>control over their IP space with the one exception of reverse lookups. >I was quoting someone else and merely replaced the word "network" with >"address_allocation." OK, but I still disagree, even with the revised statement. :) >Why don't they have reverse lookups? in-addr.arpa records control is the >only reason I care about having address space under my maintainer ID to >start with. Mostly because reverse lookups for blocks longer than /24's is still a hassle...it can be done, but is still a hassle...oh...and some things still break with CNAME -> PTR (a recent discussion on BUGTRAQ illuminates one) -- Jeff McAdams Email: jeffm@iglou.com Head Network Administrator Voice: (502) 966-3848 IgLou Internet Services (800) 436-4456
| home | help | back | first | fref | pref | prev | next | nref | lref | last | post |