[2122] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Allocation of IP Addresses
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Tim Bass (@NANOG-LIST))
Fri Mar 15 17:00:55 1996
From: Tim Bass (@NANOG-LIST) <nanog@dune.silkroad.com>
To: rgm3@is.chrysler.com (Robert Moskowitz)
Date: Fri, 15 Mar 1996 16:41:01 -0500 (EST)
Cc: bbrown@access.digex.net, perry@piermont.com, michael@memra.com,
com-priv@psi.com, nanog@merit.edu, nic-registry@internic.net,
davidc@teckla.apnic.net, davidc@apnic.net
In-Reply-To: <2.2.32.19960315212534.00baf7f4@pop3hub.is.chrysler.com> from "Robert Moskowitz" at Mar 15, 96 04:25:34 pm
Bob corrects me:
> IPv7 was the CATNIP proposal. I think you have to go out to IPv9 to get an
> unused version #.
>
>
Guess if IPv7 is CAPNIP, then IPv9 will have to be DOGFOO :-)
Thanks and regards,
Tim
