[21102] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: time for a new list?
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Steven J. Sobol)
Tue Nov 3 18:27:58 1998
Date: Tue, 3 Nov 1998 18:14:44 -0500
From: "Steven J. Sobol" <sjsobol@nacs.net>
To: "Forrest W. Christian" <forrestc@iMach.com>
Cc: Chad Skidmore <cskidmor@nwnexus.net>, nanog@merit.edu
In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSF.3.96.981102234543.2832A-100000@workhorse.iMach.com>; from Forrest W. Christian on Mon, Nov 02, 1998 at 11:57:18PM -0700
On Mon, Nov 02, 1998 at 11:57:18PM -0700, Forrest W. Christian wrote:
> The problem I see is that there doesn't seem to be any real concensus on
> what is a valid point of discussion on the list.
For me, outages are a useful topic of discussion. Since I'm not involved
in the management of backbones or WAN's, some discussion threads related
to that type of issue are not interesting to me. I do take interest in
the discussion of routing protocols, since I find a lot of the routing
discussions to be educational.
But there are many others who disagree with me.
> There seems to be some (randy?) that basically feel that if you can't
> configure a router to do it it doesn't belong here... Meaning that this
> forum should be primarily about technical operation issues.
Yes. "Operational" is a word used a lot to describe the type of post that
belongs here.
> On the other hand, there are those among us that when the subject of
> router configuration comes up, usually in the context of the right way(tm)
> to do BGP configuration, they yell and scream that this doesn't belong
> here it should be elsewhere.
Of course, then you hear complaints about people announcing routes they
shouldn't be, etc, etc. Well, is there a mailing list for the discussion of
the proper way to set up BGP? If not, it could be argued that some of the
discussions you mention belong here.
--
Steve Sobol [sjsobol@nacs.net]
Part-time Support Droid [support@nacs.net]
NACS Spaminator [abuse@nacs.net]
Spotted on a bumper sticker: "Possum. The other white meat."
