[2099] in North American Network Operators' Group

home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post

Re: Allocation of IP Addresses

daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Gordon Cook)
Thu Mar 14 20:29:32 1996

Date: Thu, 14 Mar 1996 20:20:27 -0500 (EST)
From: Gordon Cook <gcook@tigger.jvnc.net>
Reply-To: cook@cookreport.com
To: "David R. Conrad" <davidc@apnic.net>
Cc: Jim Browning <jfbb@atmnet.net>, "'com-priv list'" <com-priv@psi.com>,
        nanog@merit.edu
In-Reply-To: <199603150041.JAA03977@teckla.apnic.net>

Just a small quibble David:  when you say "the IANA" decided, it gives 
the impression that an august group of people like the IESG took action.  
In reality "the IANA" is but a SINGLE person - John Postel.  If some 
people are upset I suspect it might be because the power to make such a 
decision is vested in the hands of ONE person rather than in a group.

*********************************************************************
Gordon Cook, Editor & Publisher    Subscriptions: Individ-ascii   $85
The COOK Report on Internet                 Individ. hard copy   $150
431 Greenway Ave, Ewing, NJ 08618 USA       Small Corp & Gov't   $200
(609) 882-2572                              Corporate            $350
Internet: cook@cookreport.com               Corporate Site Lic.  $650
http://pobox.com/cook/  for new COOK Report Glossary of Internet terms 
*********************************************************************


On Fri, 15 Mar 1996, David R. Conrad wrote:

> It would appear a clarification is necesssary:
> 
> >>>The @Home allocation was done outside of normal registry procedures by
> >>>the IANA directly.  InterNIC should not be held responsible for that
> >>>case.
> >Which confirms that the rules are not well established nor consistently applied.
> 
> Any very large or unusual request must go outside normal registry
> procedures (e.g., slow start).  @Home is such a case.  They made their
> case directly to the IANA as InterNIC is not authorized to allocate
> very large or unusual requests directly.  The IANA authorized the
> allocation based on the merits of the request (whatever they might
> be).  None of the registries can allocate very large or unusual
> requests directly.  This rule is quite well established and
> consistently applied.
> 
> Regards,
> -drc
> 

home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post