[20957] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: exodus?
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Jim Browne)
Fri Oct 30 01:46:54 1998
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.3.96.981029160824.15258A-100000@ns1.netmdc.com>
Date: Thu, 29 Oct 1998 22:30:21 -0800
To: John Gonzalez/netMDC admin <ekool@ns1.netmdc.com>
From: Jim Browne <jbrowne@jbrowne.com>
Cc: nanog@merit.edu
At 16:09 -0700 10/29/98, John Gonzalez/netMDC admin wrote:
>Anybody else have any problems with exodus, or is it just me?
>
>traceroute to beta.sierra.com (209.67.71.106), 30 hops max, 40 byte
>packets
[...]
> 4 core5.SanFrancisco.cw.net (204.70.4.85) 110.107 ms 65.928 ms 78.949
>ms
> 5 * pb-nap-OC3-1.exodus.net (198.32.128.25) 51.899 ms *
> 6 * * *
> 7 * scca-05-p1-0.core.exodus.net (209.1.169.41) 86.462 ms 140.852 ms
We're seeing the same thing. We've been route-map-ing around it since
10/02/98. On that date Exodus claimed that "MCI [C&W] is oversubscribed to
the PB-NAP."
Jim Browne jbrowne@jbrowne.com
"I wish journalism would return to its glory days, when principled
incorruptible men like William Randolph Hearst and Joseph Pulitzer were in
charge."- Vanessa Jackson, Piano Teacher, www.theonion.com
