[20511] in North American Network Operators' Group
RE: Gigarouter
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Greg Mirsky)
Thu Oct 15 13:37:50 1998
From: Greg Mirsky <gmirsky@nexabit.com>
To: "Howard C. Berkowitz" <hcb@clark.net>, nanog@merit.edu
Date: Thu, 15 Oct 1998 11:17:45 -0400
My apologies to those offended by my note. I wouldn't argue about
terminology so much. If GRF and GSR get into Gigarouter category - fine
with me and my sincere congrats to all. What I've ment was that, as you
all know, there are M40 out there and it's only the beginning of new and
exciting era. And it wasn't 'vendor's shpil'.
Again, sorry and good luck in pumping these Gigabytes!
Greg
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Howard C. Berkowitz [SMTP:hcb@clark.net]
> Sent: Thursday, October 15, 1998 11:05 AM
> To: nanog@merit.edu
> Subject: RE: Gigarouter
>
> Greg Mirsky observed,
>
> >Rogerio,
> >these are not REAL gigarouters. Real once yet to come ;). Stay tuned
> >
> > Greg
> >
>
> Or is it that the current ones are gigarouters, but the next
> generation
> will be terable?
>
