[20507] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Gigarouter
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Nathan Stratton)
Thu Oct 15 11:03:49 1998
Date: Thu, 15 Oct 1998 10:48:16 -0400 (EDT)
From: Nathan Stratton <nathan@robotics.net>
To: Rogerio Alvarez - DRS23 <rogerio@embratel.net.br>
cc: nanog@merit.edu, eng-l@embratel.net.br
In-Reply-To: <199810151335.LAA12669@rjo09.embratel.net.br>
On Thu, 15 Oct 1998, Rogerio Alvarez - DRS23 wrote:
> Hi.
>
> Anyone there has any information (experience) about Gigarouters like
> GRF1600 (Ascend) or
The product had a lot of problems when it first came out (I was a beta
customer), but with hard work Ascend fixed all of them. The box now nice
and stable. If you want to do a lot of OC12 interfaces I would go with the
GSR, but if you are looking for a box to replace your 75xx with, then I
would go with the GRF.
> GSR12000 (Cisco).
Very stable, but I have only worked with them for a few weeks.
> I want to know performance, availability, scalability and limitations
> data in "real world",
> I mean in real condition of internet traffic.
The GRF function just find in real world conditions.
> Thanks in advance.
>
> Rogerio
><>
Nathan Stratton Telecom & ISP Consulting
www.robotics.net nathan@robotics.net
--
"No king is saved by the size of his army; no warrior escapes by
his great strength." - Psalm 33:16
