[20494] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Maybe I'm misreading this but...
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Marc Slemko)
Wed Oct 14 22:31:05 1998
Date: Wed, 14 Oct 1998 19:10:07 -0700 (PDT)
From: Marc Slemko <marcs@znep.com>
To: Chris Cappuccio <chris@empnet.com>
cc: nanog@merit.edu, noc@sprintlink.net
In-Reply-To: <Pine.NEB.4.05.9810141540270.19688-100000@mimosa.noc.empnet.com>
On Wed, 14 Oct 1998, Chris Cappuccio wrote:
> On Wed, 14 Oct 1998, Barry Shein wrote:
>
> |
> | The following traceroute seems to indicate, according to ARIN, that
> | someone is running routers for spammers in the IANA Reserved netspace?
> |
>
> You are mis-reading this because the 172 addresses are not routeable. In a
> traceroute, a router can say that it is any IP address it likes, but that
> does not mean that you can traceroute to 172.x.y.z... It just means that the
> routers are most likely using those IP addresses for private interconnect
Yea, well, just 'cause it isn't routable doesn't mean people won't
advertise it.
I see that Sprint is still winning the bogus route advertisements war
with:
1.1.1/30
1.1.1.4/30
1.1.1.8/30
1.1.1.12/30
1.1.1.16/30
1.1.1.20/30
1.1.1.24/30
2.52.228.144
Funny how when someone starts a bogus advertisement it is almost always
sprint or a sprint customer.