[20476] in North American Network Operators' Group

home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post

Re: IGPs in use

daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Henk Smit)
Wed Oct 14 13:02:18 1998

Date: Wed, 14 Oct 1998 08:28:21 -0700 (PDT)
From: Henk Smit <hsmit@cisco.com>
To: tli@juniper.net (Tony Li)
Cc: nanog@merit.edu

Tony Li wrote:
>From a theoretical perspective, they both scale exactly the same.  To wit:
>a two level hierarchy, with SPF within each level.  Given ideal conditions,
>one could reasonably build a 160,000 router network with either protocol
>today without too much difficulty (400 nodes per area).
>
>From a practical perspective, the implementation differences and topology
>issues dominate their practical applicability.

  When one compares the complexity of the SPF calculation itself,
 both OSPF and ISIS scale in a similar way.

  The way routing information is packaged in LSAs and LSPs is different.
 They way those LSAs and LSPs are flooded is different too.
 I think these difference are more important when one compares scalability
 between ISIS and OSPF.

     Henk.

home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post