[20471] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: IGPs in use
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (bmanning@vacation.karoshi.com)
Wed Oct 14 09:27:34 1998
From: bmanning@vacation.karoshi.com
To: smd@clock.org (Sean M. Doran)
Date: Tue, 13 Oct 1998 23:24:10 -0700 (PDT)
Cc: randy@psg.com, vandry@Mlink.NET, nanog@merit.edu
In-Reply-To: <19981014092207Z27209-20840+46@cesium.clock.org> from "Sean M. Doran" at Oct 14, 98 02:22:00 am
> | > most large nsps use is-is, but usually only to carry the routes of the bgp
> | > speaking interfaces.
> |
> | Really?? Not that I desire to express any prejudices, but I honestly
> | thought nobody used it.
>
> Everywhere that Peter went...
>
> It wouldn't surprise me to learn that everywhere that Andrew went
> does it too.
& Jack, Jessica, & Cathy.... :)
> Frankly, though, I'm hoping that rather than locking themselves
> in the room to "improve" IS-IS, the Obvious People lock themselves
> into a room and build something else instead (which they might simply
> call IS-IS, even if it isn't. Been there, done that, called it BGP).
Seen the current discussions on ISIS(v2)? :)
--bill
