[2046] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Allocation of IP Addresses
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (David R. Conrad)
Wed Mar 13 23:44:28 1996
To: Jim Browning <jfbb@atmnet.net>
cc: "'David R. Conrad'" <davidc@apnic.net>, Michael Dillon <michael@memra.com>,
"'com-priv list'" <com-priv@psi.com>,
"davidc@teckla.apnic.net" <davidc@teckla.apnic.net>,
"'NANOG List'" <nanog@merit.edu>,
"'NIC Registry list'" <nic-registry@internic.net>
In-reply-to: Your message of "Wed, 13 Mar 1996 20:14:50 PST."
<01BB1119.BC897440@jfbb.atmnet.net>
Date: Thu, 14 Mar 1996 13:30:54 +0900
From: "David R. Conrad" <davidc@apnic.net>
Hi,
>The answer is to have published, objective criteria, consistently applied,
>with a defined appeal process and accountability.
See the latest allocation policy draft -- it attempts to do that.
Comments on the draft would be welcome, see:
draft-hubbard-registry-guidelines-00.txt
>It's hard to play by the
>rules if you don't know what they are, and one has only to look at the /14
>allocation to @Home to realize that the "slow start" rules do not apply to
>everyone equally.
The @Home allocation was done outside of normal registry procedures by
the IANA directly. InterNIC should not be held responsible for that
case.
Regards,
-drc
