[20445] in North American Network Operators' Group

home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post

Re: IGPs in use

daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Phillip Vandry)
Tue Oct 13 14:39:04 1998

Date: Tue, 13 Oct 1998 14:24:23 -0400 (EDT)
From: Phillip Vandry <vandry@Mlink.NET>
To: Randy Bush <randy@psg.com>
cc: nanog@merit.edu
In-reply-to: Your message of "Mon, 12 Oct 1998 14:55:10 EDT."
             <199810122155.OAA23509@rip.psg.com> 

> instead of descending into a silly syntax discussion of whether ibgp is an
> egp or an igp, perhaps the guy would like an answer to his question.
> 
> most large nsps use is-is, but usually only to carry the routes of the bgp
> speaking interfaces.

Really?? Not that I desire to express any prejudices, but I honestly
thought nobody used it.

Does it just work better for very large networks?

-Phil

home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post