[20132] in North American Network Operators' Group
open letter (Re: NSI Bulletin 098-013 | gtld server)
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Paul Vixie)
Tue Oct 6 01:34:26 1998
To: dholtz@internic.net ("David H. Holtzman")
cc: nanog@merit.edu
From: Paul Vixie <paul@vix.com>
Date: 05 Oct 1998 22:25:50 -0700
In-Reply-To: dholtz@internic.net's message of 5 Oct 1998 12:26:52 -0700
I have three questions about:
dholtz@internic.net ("David H. Holtzman") writes:
> In a continuing effort to enhance service to the community, Network
> Solutions has added another gTLD server, f.gtld-servers.net (207.159.77.18)
> at PAIX, Palo Alto, CA. The server will be operation in the next couple of
> days. This server will serve the .com, .net and .org domains only.
> _____________________________________
> David H. Holtzman (dholtz@internic.net)
> Sr Vice President of Engineering
> Network Solutions, Inc.
1. As the operator of F.ROOT-SERVERS.NET, which is also at PAIX, I'm
curious to know whether your reselection of the letter "F" in your host's
name indicates a relationship between your "F" and my "F"?
2. In the past, changes in the COM delegation have been made via IANA.
Since IANA was not involved in this announcement, should I interpret this
as a unilateral move on NSI's part?
3. Does NSI still think of COM, NET, and ORG as its intellectual property?
And is this belief bolstered in some way by the ICANN announcements?
--
Paul Vixie
La Honda, CA "Many NANOG members have been around
<paul@vix.com> longer than most." --Jim Fleming
pacbell!vixie!paul (An H.323 GateKeeper for the IPv8 Network)