[20018] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Is the .to (Tonga) domain completely rogue and should be removed?
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Barry Shein)
Thu Oct 1 16:33:15 1998
Date: Thu, 1 Oct 1998 16:04:30 -0400
From: Barry Shein <bzs@world.std.com>
To: "Steven J. Sobol" <sjsobol@nacs.net>
Cc: Barry Shein <bzs@world.std.com>,
"Sam Hayes Merritt, III" <harter@feeding.frenzy.com>,
list@inet-access.net, inet-access@earth.com, nanog@merit.edu,
domain-policy@lists.internic.net, com-priv@psi.com,
publicaffairs@panet.us-state.gov
In-Reply-To: <19981001154305.33895@shell.nacs.net>
This is not a review process, what good would providing any proof
whatsoever do? Other than perhaps satisfying your personal curiosity.
That's the whole point.
-b
On October 1, 1998 at 15:43 sjsobol@nacs.net (Steven J. Sobol) wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 01, 1998 at 01:43:03PM -0400, Barry Shein wrote:
>
> > Com does not have the problem that it's nearly exclusively used for
> > these kinds of things.
>
> Provide proof that .TO DOES.
>
> > If com had just about zero commercial sites you might have a point.
>
> This assertion is based on what proof?
>
> --
>
> Anyone who spams me will be subject to torture by Jake,
> my killer attack hedgehog, and/or Lizzy and Junior, my man-eating iguanas.
