[20012] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Is the .to (Tonga) domain completely rogue and should be removed?
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Steven J. Sobol)
Thu Oct 1 16:00:29 1998
Date: Thu, 1 Oct 1998 15:43:05 -0400
From: "Steven J. Sobol" <sjsobol@nacs.net>
To: Barry Shein <bzs@world.std.com>
Cc: "Sam Hayes Merritt, III" <harter@feeding.frenzy.com>, list@inet-access.net,
"Steven J. Sobol" <sjsobol@nacs.net>, inet-access@earth.com,
nanog@merit.edu, domain-policy@lists.internic.net, com-priv@psi.com,
publicaffairs@panet.us-state.gov
In-Reply-To: <199810011743.AA25993@world.std.com>; from Barry Shein on Thu, Oct 01, 1998 at 01:43:03PM -0400
On Thu, Oct 01, 1998 at 01:43:03PM -0400, Barry Shein wrote:
> Com does not have the problem that it's nearly exclusively used for
> these kinds of things.
Provide proof that .TO DOES.
> If com had just about zero commercial sites you might have a point.
This assertion is based on what proof?
--
Anyone who spams me will be subject to torture by Jake,
my killer attack hedgehog, and/or Lizzy and Junior, my man-eating iguanas.