[20003] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Is the .to (Tonga) domain completely rogue an
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (J.D. Falk)
Thu Oct 1 15:07:55 1998
Date: Thu, 1 Oct 1998 11:47:12 -0700
From: "J.D. Falk" <jdfalk@cp.net>
To: Patrick Greenwell <patrick@namesecure.com>,
Eric Gullichsen <egullich@tonic.to>
Cc: nanog@merit.edu, chriso@wired.com
Mail-Followup-To: Patrick Greenwell <patrick@namesecure.com>,
Eric Gullichsen <egullich@tonic.to>, nanog@merit.edu,
chriso@wired.com
In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSI.4.04.9810010923450.2705-100000@po1.namesecure.com>; from Patrick Greenwell on Thu, Oct 01, 1998 at 09:26:08AM -0700
On 10/01/98, Patrick Greenwell <patrick@namesecure.com> wrote:
> On 1 Oct 1998, Eric Gullichsen wrote:
>
> > We are sorry to hear that you have been having problem with SPAM involving a
> >.TO domain, and wish to draw your attention to the fact that .TO is the
> >*only* top level domain we know of with an explicit antispam policy.
>
> Nope. Both .NU and .CC do as well off the top of my head.
IIRC, TOnic was the first.
--
J.D. Falk <jdfalk@cp.net> Have you hugged your backups today?
Special Agent In Charge (Abuse Issues)
Critical Path, Inc.
------ Critical Path is hiring in all departments! ------
