[1998] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: RS transparency survey
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Jessica Yu)
Thu Mar 7 10:21:40 1996
To: khuon@Merit.Net
cc: nanog@Merit.Net
Date: Thu, 07 Mar 1996 10:03:03 -0500
From: Jessica Yu <jyy@ans.net>
Jake:
How about doing the following:
By default, insert RS's AS in the path unless otherwise requested by the peer?
There is a RS peer request template which might be a good place to allow
new peers to specify if they want the AS inserted or not.
Please re-insert the RS's AS for the RS peer session with AS690 for now.
Thanks!
--Jessica
------- Forwarded Message
Return-Path: nanog-owner@merit.edu
Received: from interlock (interlock.ans.net [147.225.5.2]) by cannes.aa.ans.net (8.7.4/8.7.3) with SMTP id XAA11095 for <jyy@cannes.aa.ans.net>; Wed, 6 Mar 1996 23:07:24 -0500 (EST)
Received: from merit.edu by interlock with SMTP id AA11622
(InterLock SMTP Gateway 3.0 for <jyy@ans.net>);
Wed, 6 Mar 1996 23:07:17 -0500
Received: (from daemon@localhost) by merit.edu (8.7.4/merit-2.0) id WAA21066 for nanog-outgoing; Wed, 6 Mar 1996 22:00:42 -0500 (EST)
Received: from merit.edu (espresso.merit.net [198.108.60.61]) by merit.edu (8.7.4/merit-2.0) with ESMTP id WAA21060 for <nanog@Merit.Net>; Wed, 6 Mar 1996 22:00:37 -0500 (EST)
Message-Id: <199603070300.WAA21060@merit.edu>
From: "Jake Khuon" <khuon@Merit.Net>
To: "North American Network Operator's Group Mailing List" <nanog@Merit.Net>
Subject: RS transparency survey
Reply-To: khuon@Merit.Net (Jake Khuon)
Priority: Normal
X-Uri: http://Espresso.Merit.Net/~khuon/
X-Organisation: Merit Network, Inc.
X-Mailer: MH 6.8.4 #4[UCI] (Espresso.Merit.Net) of Mon Feb 19 15:14:03 EST 1996
Date: Wed, 06 Mar 1996 22:01:52 -0500
Sender: owner-nanog@merit.edu
Precedence: bulk
Content-Type: text
Content-Length: 890
Some of you may have noticed that the RSes have stopped injecting their ASN
into the ASPath expression. This was a feature I have just recently turned
on to meet the original design goals of the project. As per specification,
the RSes were to be transparent in its operation.
I realise I may have erred by doing this without asking the community first.
Therefore, I would like to take a poll as to what everyone prefers. I can
turn the ASN injection back on in a peer-by-peer basis if necessary. I
sincerely apologise if this has caused any confusions and/or problems.
- --
/*====================[ Jake Khuon <khuon@Merit.Net> ]=====================+
| Systems Research Programmer, IE Group /| /|[~|)|~|~ N E T W O R K |
| Vox: (313) 763-4907 Fax: (313) 747-3185 / |/ |[_|\| | Incorporated |
+==[ Suite C2122, Bldg. 1 4251 Plymouth Rd. Ann Arbor, MI 48105-2785 ]==*/
------- End of Forwarded Message
