[19979] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Is the .to (Tonga) domain completely rogue an
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Patrick Greenwell)
Thu Oct 1 13:22:10 1998
Date: Thu, 1 Oct 1998 09:26:08 -0700 (PDT)
From: Patrick Greenwell <patrick@namesecure.com>
To: Eric Gullichsen <egullich@tonic.to>
cc: nanog@merit.edu, chriso@wired.com
In-Reply-To: <19981001070437.14610.qmail@findmail.com>
On 1 Oct 1998, Eric Gullichsen wrote:
> We are sorry to hear that you have been having problem with SPAM involving a
>.TO domain, and wish to draw your attention to the fact that .TO is the
>*only* top level domain we know of with an explicit antispam policy.
Nope. Both .NU and .CC do as well off the top of my head.
/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\
Patrick Greenwell (800) 299-1288 v
CTO (925) 377-1212 v
NameSecure (925) 377-1414 f
Coming to the ISPF? The Forum for ISPs by ISPs http://www.ispf.com
\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/
