[19739] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Traffic exceeds link capacity.
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Brian Horvitz)
Wed Sep 23 13:02:34 1998
Date: Wed, 23 Sep 1998 12:51:37 -0400 (EDT)
From: Brian Horvitz <horvitz@shore.net>
To: alex@nac.net
cc: jhyang <jhyang@nuri.net>, nanog@merit.edu
In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSF.3.96.980923122521.2585B-100000@iago.nac.net>
We're not talking an aggregate number here are we? Or is it that the
average in (or out) over the previous 5 minutes was greater than the speed
of the circuit?
Brian
On Wed, 23 Sep 1998 alex@nac.net wrote:
>
> > When the phenomenen occurs, the total inbound traffic of (B) and (C)
> > shows near 45 mbps (about 43.x mbps).
>
> >
> > My question is:
> > Is it true that it indicates 60~70 mbps ? (Of cause, it has many
> > output drops.) or Is it bug?
> >
>
>
> I recall this being a bug, I had a T1 that did 1.9 mb/s.
>
> I recall 11.2.x or 11.1.21 fixing it.
>
>
> > The cpu load increases upto 99%, and it freezes router for short
> > time -about 1~2 minute-. How to resolve this errors ?
> >
> > Our Router is:
> > CISCO 7507
> > RSP2
> > IOS: 11.1.19 (CC)
> > Enable CEF on (A): It is better than not using CEF. But the result
> > doen't matter. (High CPU load, ..)
> >
> > Any Idea ?
> >
> > Thanks in advance
> >
> > --Jaeho Yang.
> >
>
> -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- --
> ISPF, The Forum for ISPs by ISPs. October 26-28, 1998, Atlanta, GA.
> Three days of clues, news, and views from the industry's best and
> brightest. http://www.ispf.com/ for information and registration.
>
> Atheism is a non-prophet organization. I route, therefore I am.
> Alex Rubenstein, alex@nac.net, KC2BUO, ISP/C Charter Member
> Father of the Network and Head Bottle-Washer
> Net Access Corporation, 9 Mt. Pleasant Tpk., Denville, NJ 07834
> Don't choose a spineless ISP; we have more backbone! http://www.nac.net
> -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- --
>
>
---
Brian Horvitz
Shore.Net
Network Engineering
