[196304] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Terminology Clarification - "Active Wave"
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Justin Wilson)
Tue Oct 17 05:13:00 2017
X-Original-To: nanog@nanog.org
From: Justin Wilson <lists@mtin.net>
Date: Tue, 17 Oct 2017 00:24:05 -0400
To: "nanog@nanog.org" <nanog@nanog.org>
In-Reply-To: <CAJwoEk3-L9CCMV8FAxQhwEQGZRK_s9d0bdCh7+7wU0skuqT5Kg@mail.gmail.com>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces@nanog.org
I agree with Tony Wicks. I have seen an =E2=80=9Cactive=E2=80=9D wave =
referred to on active wave gear a a =E2=80=9Cpassive=E2=80=9D wave on a =
passive mux.
Justin Wilson
j2sw@mtin.net
www.mtin.net
www.midwest-ix.com
> On Oct 1, 2017, at 4:29 PM, jeff herbel <herbeljs@gmail.com> wrote:
>=20
> Yes. They might be thinking of dark fiber..
>=20
> On Sun, Oct 1, 2017, 4:20 PM Rod Beck <rod.beck@unitedcablecompany.com =
<mailto:rod.beck@unitedcablecompany.com>>
> wrote:
>=20
>> A financial firm asked me if a 10 gig wave offer was an "active =
wave". =F0=9F=98=A8
>>=20
>>=20
>> LAN PHY 10 GigE, WAN PHY 10 GigE, transparent, STM64, OC192. Yes.
>>=20
>>=20
>> Active?
>>=20
>>=20
>> Roderick Beck
>>=20
>> Director of Global Sales
>>=20
>> United Cable Company
>>=20
>> www.unitedcablecompany.com<http://www.unitedcablecompany.com>
>>=20
>> 85 Kir=C3=A1ly utca
>> <https://maps.google.com/?q=3D85+Kir%C3%A1ly+utca&entry=3Dgmail&source=3D=
g =
<https://maps.google.com/?q=3D85+Kir%C3%A1ly+utca&entry=3Dgmail&source=3Dg=
>>,
>> 1077 Budapest
>>=20
>> rod.beck@unitedcablecompany.com =
<mailto:rod.beck@unitedcablecompany.com>
>>=20
>> 36-30-859-5144
>>=20
>>=20
>> [1467221477350_image005.png]
