[196191] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Why don't large carriers use alternate communication routes?
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Leo Bicknell)
Wed Oct 11 14:47:59 2017
X-Original-To: nanog@nanog.org
Date: Wed, 11 Oct 2017 06:23:06 -0700
From: Leo Bicknell <bicknell@ufp.org>
To: nanog@nanog.org
Mail-Followup-To: nanog@nanog.org
In-Reply-To: <nycvar.OFS.7.76.1710101910360.48579@cnex.qbaryna.pbz>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces@nanog.org
--LZvS9be/3tNcYl/X
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
In a message written on Tue, Oct 10, 2017 at 07:19:15PM -0400, Sean Donelan=
wrote:
> Are the penalties for subscribe outages so minimal that it makes business=
=20
> sense not to use backup alternate routes?
There are penalties for subscriber outages? Do tell! Where?
--=20
Leo Bicknell - bicknell@ufp.org
PGP keys at http://www.ufp.org/~bicknell/
--LZvS9be/3tNcYl/X
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----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=SybY
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--LZvS9be/3tNcYl/X--
