[196153] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: RFC 1918 network range choices
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Daniel Karrenberg)
Sat Oct 7 06:07:54 2017
X-Original-To: nanog@nanog.org
To: nanog@nanog.org
From: Daniel Karrenberg <dfk@ripe.net>
Date: Fri, 6 Oct 2017 11:36:32 -0700
In-Reply-To: <m2fuaxnxtt.wl-randy@psg.com>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
On 05/10/2017 13:28, Randy Bush wrote:
>>> The answer seems to be "no, Jon's not answering his email anymore".
>
> jon was not a big supporter of rfc1918
If I recall correctly not one of the authors was a "big supporter". Some
things are not full of beauty and glory; yet they have to be done.
I recall a number of conversations with Jon about this, at least one of
them face-to-face. I am convinced he fully agreed that it was necessary.
Daniel
