[196141] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Anyone from AT&T DNS?
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Christopher Morrow)
Fri Oct 6 06:57:54 2017
X-Original-To: nanog@nanog.org
In-Reply-To: <50298399-672D-4BA1-A726-7128B84B89FF@apple.com>
From: Christopher Morrow <morrowc.lists@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 4 Oct 2017 23:20:36 -0400
To: Matt Peterman <mpeterman@apple.com>
Cc: nanog list <nanog@nanog.org>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces@nanog.org
On Wed, Oct 4, 2017 at 11:18 PM, Matt Peterman <mpeterman@apple.com> wrote:
> Got it! You=E2=80=99re the winner here. I just setup both of my zones the=
name way
> and obviously AT&T changed the way they did RDNS entries from when I got =
a
> /25 last November and this second /25 in June. Oh well!
>
> Now I am running into the challenge of Route53 does seem to support
> creating an authoritative zone for "128/25.168.207.107.in-addr.arpa.=E2=
=80=9D It
> changes it to "128\05725.168.207.107.in-addr.arpa.=E2=80=9D every time=E2=
=80=A6 *sigh* If
> it isn't one thing its something else.
>
>
I've not messed with route53 but fortunately you are treading on well
trodden ground:
https://forums.aws.amazon.com/thread.jspa?messageID=3D674778
have a happy evening! (and I hope that the above works.. again I haven't
and can't actually try it)
