[195704] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Moving fibre trunks: interruptions?
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Baldur Norddahl)
Sun Sep 3 13:32:37 2017
X-Original-To: nanog@nanog.org
In-Reply-To: <CAPkb-7DGc5DiY+tprd9i93AR6ZVM-XKbS0YJkqD+KU_+y-wrfA@mail.gmail.com>
From: Baldur Norddahl <baldur.norddahl@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 3 Sep 2017 19:22:39 +0200
To: nanog@nanog.org
Errors-To: nanog-bounces@nanog.org
Den 2. sep. 2017 21.49 skrev "Michael Hallgren" <mh@xalto.net>:
Le 02/09/2017 =C3=A0 21:25, Baldur Norddahl a =C3=A9crit :
> That depends on the country. Here in Denmark it is not possible to get
> rights to put up any aerial at all. The cost difference is irrelevant whe=
n
> you have no option but to put it in the ground.
>
> Not only is there no new aerial installations here but the old ones are
> taken down. Very little is left by now and in a few years it will all be
> gone. The municipalities want it pretty and wires in the air is ugly.
>
> One advantage however is that buried stuff usually survives storms better=
.
Right. Here in France it (aerial running along with copper) happens
even close to metropoles (like Paris).
mh
>
I expect it is mostly northern Europe that is doing the no aerial thing.
