[195700] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Moving fibre trunks: interruptions?
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Michael Hallgren)
Sat Sep 2 15:47:59 2017
X-Original-To: nanog@nanog.org
To: nanog@nanog.org
From: Michael Hallgren <mh@xalto.net>
Date: Sat, 2 Sep 2017 21:47:47 +0200
In-Reply-To: <CAPkb-7D-ei84n6Zv2SNvLLFcDpqDDrfumDAes7CrfxmdWY+v+w@mail.gmail.com>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces@nanog.org
Le 02/09/2017 à 21:25, Baldur Norddahl a écrit :
> That depends on the country. Here in Denmark it is not possible to get
> rights to put up any aerial at all. The cost difference is irrelevant when
> you have no option but to put it in the ground.
>
> Not only is there no new aerial installations here but the old ones are
> taken down. Very little is left by now and in a few years it will all be
> gone. The municipalities want it pretty and wires in the air is ugly.
>
> One advantage however is that buried stuff usually survives storms better.
Right. Here in France it (aerial running along with copper) happens
even close to metropoles (like Paris).
mh
>
> Den 1. sep. 2017 21.53 skrev "Rod Beck" <rod.beck@unitedcablecompany.com>:
>
> I don't think there is virtually any aerial in Europe. So given the cost
> difference why is virtually all fiber buried on this side of the Atlantic?
