[195278] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: noction vs border6 vs kentik vs fcp vs ?
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (valdis.kletnieks@vt.edu)
Wed Jul 12 15:37:50 2017
X-Original-To: nanog@nanog.org
From: valdis.kletnieks@vt.edu
X-Google-Original-From: Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu
To: ShaColby Jackson <shacolby@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAECgb9537Uh71K4XjV-kf=WavCKqFkOXtPe4XTDLdMVMZZgMsw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 12 Jul 2017 15:37:40 -0400
Cc: nanog@nanog.org
Errors-To: nanog-bounces@nanog.org
--==_Exmh_1499888260_2939P
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
On Wed, 12 Jul 2017 11:03:50 -0700, ShaColby Jackson said:
> I know solutions like Kentik do a lot more but I’m focusing on just the
> above use case. Also ignoring the cloud vs. on-prem difference, assume that
> doesn’t matter.
Might want to re-think that. In a world where some eyeball networks are
reporting that 60%+ of the traffic is Netflix, there's a big difference
between the Netflix CDN cloud and having a local Netflix cache box on
the local net. Akamai is another company making coin assuming it does matter.
(I'm assuming you don't actually know what percent of your traffic is
Netflix/Akamai - if you already had that breakout, you'd not be asking
for suggestions as you have already have an in-house solution...)
--==_Exmh_1499888260_2939P
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Comment: Exmh version 2.8.0 04/21/2017
iQEVAwUBWWZ6hI0DS38y7CIcAQICNAgApHm4IQbs9vCiEgWlKGf/Nw2cEl6BwFmj
SLdfN/kuBwSm1DNCRXu1l9NTtVWHSG51wPl0vKrido96OcQBvJVy7LUA8vCd9ybf
H+vgVO2ehZXvlJnemFeMNVASRPK3f/buRF60HTrjdUH4h+Kurhym+xF01G4toGf/
J6Evq0pw4sj5fYj3j6XIc+R2W8sKCwYDR2nz8Ia1kqMyZJ302O913JktfluXTB0j
WSASJ6nMuux+Vch9TAWZC5BkedXHngHzBDp/R5Ojja2afJvPI8NFNHTPzL0WjHwb
MFmHpRsufqRtAmO893Slkn0mykBDMr4MTyyBA+PlXHGeB5Fo6tpapw==
=6IRg
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--==_Exmh_1499888260_2939P--
