[195246] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Some advice on IPv6 planning and ARIN request, please
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (=?utf-8?Q?Bj=C3=B8rn_Mork?=)
Sun Jul 9 12:52:54 2017
X-Original-To: nanog@nanog.org
From: =?utf-8?Q?Bj=C3=B8rn_Mork?= <bjorn@mork.no>
To: "Radu-Adrian Feurdean" <nanog@radu-adrian.feurdean.net>
Date: Sun, 09 Jul 2017 18:52:43 +0200
In-Reply-To: <1499547633.1276091.1034540536.04D82DA7@webmail.messagingengine.com>
(Radu-Adrian Feurdean's message of "Sat, 08 Jul 2017 23:00:33 +0200")
Cc: nanog@nanog.org
Errors-To: nanog-bounces@nanog.org
"Radu-Adrian Feurdean" <nanog@radu-adrian.feurdean.net> writes:
> No, but I assume IPv6 is still subject to common-sense.
I don't see how you can make that assumption.
If common sense had been applied, then people would have realized that
there are more important parameters than address conservation to
consider when it comes to IPv6 planning/design/discussions/whatever.
Bj=C3=B8rn
