[195161] in North American Network Operators' Group
RE: Point 2 point IPs between ASes
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Aaron Gould)
Thu Jun 29 00:51:21 2017
X-Original-To: nanog@nanog.org
From: "Aaron Gould" <aaron1@gvtc.com>
To: "'William Herrin'" <bill@herrin.us>
In-Reply-To: <CAP-guGXnX_-CNCmiBGyf-EBN=wofhNq4CoSKv=QKROOQOtn95A@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 28 Jun 2017 23:51:18 -0500
Cc: nanog@nanog.org
Errors-To: nanog-bounces@nanog.org
Thanks Bill, I thought with ipv6 it was a sin to subnet on bit =
boundaries and not on nibble boundaries.
=20
Heck, I=E2=80=99m gonna do whatever it takes to NOT subnet on bits with =
my v6 deployment. Hopefully with v6, gone are the days of binary =
subnetting math.
=20
-Aaron Gould
=20
From: William Herrin [mailto:bill@herrin.us]=20
Sent: Wednesday, June 28, 2017 7:33 PM
To: Aaron Gould <aaron1@gvtc.com>
Cc: Tom Beecher <beecher@beecher.cc>; Job Snijders <job@instituut.net>; =
nanog@nanog.org
Subject: Re: Point 2 point IPs between ASes
=20
On Wed, Jun 28, 2017 at 8:01 PM, Aaron Gould <aaron1@gvtc.com =
<mailto:aaron1@gvtc.com> > wrote:
I think this is funny... I have (4) 10 gig internet connections and =
here's the maskings for my v6 dual stacking...
/126 - telia
/64 - att
/112 - cogent
/127 - twc/charter/spectrum
=20
112... Could be worse I suppose. They could have picked 113.
-Bill
--=20
William Herrin ................ herrin@dirtside.com =
<mailto:herrin@dirtside.com> bill@herrin.us <mailto:bill@herrin.us>=20
Dirtside Systems ......... Web: <http://www.dirtside.com/>
