[195157] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Point 2 point IPs between ASes
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Olivier Benghozi)
Wed Jun 28 21:14:04 2017
X-Original-To: nanog@nanog.org
From: Olivier Benghozi <olivier.benghozi@wifirst.fr>
Date: Thu, 29 Jun 2017 03:10:47 +0200
To: "nanog@nanog.org" <nanog@nanog.org>
In-Reply-To: <CAP-guGXnX_-CNCmiBGyf-EBN=wofhNq4CoSKv=QKROOQOtn95A@mail.gmail.com>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces@nanog.org
Well, /112 is not a stupid option (and is far smarter than /64): it =
contains the whole last nibble of an IPv6, that is x:x:x:x:x:x:x:1234.
You always put 1 or 2 at the end, and if needed you are still able to =
address additional stuff would the point-to-point link become a LAN.
And you don't throw away billions of addresses like with /64.
> On 29 jun 2017 at 02:32, William Herrin <bill@herrin.us> wrote :
>=20
> On Wed, Jun 28, 2017 at 8:01 PM, Aaron Gould <aaron1@gvtc.com> wrote:
>=20
>> I think this is funny... I have (4) 10 gig internet connections and =
here's
>> the maskings for my v6 dual stacking...
>>=20
>> /126 - telia
>> /64 - att
>> /112 - cogent
>> /127 - twc/charter/spectrum
>=20
> 112... Could be worse I suppose. They could have picked 113.
