[195093] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Long AS Path
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Stephen Satchell)
Wed Jun 21 08:32:12 2017
X-Original-To: nanog@nanog.org
From: Stephen Satchell <list@satchell.net>
To: sthaug@nethelp.no, "nanog@nanog.org" <nanog@nanog.org>
Date: Wed, 21 Jun 2017 05:31:51 -0700
In-Reply-To: <20170621.095626.74671742.sthaug@nethelp.no>
Reply-To: list@satchell.net
Errors-To: nanog-bounces@nanog.org
On 06/21/2017 12:56 AM, sthaug@nethelp.no wrote:
> I see no valid reason for such long AS paths. Time to update filters
> here. I'm tempted to set the cutoff at 30 - can anybody see a good
> reason to permit longer AS paths?
>
Well, as I mentioned in my Net Neutrality filing to the FCC, a TTL of 30
is OK for intra-planet routing, but when you start leaving the big blue
marble you will need to allow the packets to live longer.
Your network, your decisions
<g,d&rlh>
