[19505] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: GTEI/Exodus
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (steve@altrina.exodus.net)
Tue Sep 15 22:54:39 1998
From: steve@altrina.exodus.net
Date: Tue, 15 Sep 1998 19:47:44 -0700
To: jon@zeeff.com
Cc: tim@clipper.net, list@inet-access.net, nanog@merit.edu
In-Reply-To: <m0zJ7UG-0004N7C@rasta.whs.verio.net>; from Jon Zeeff on Tue, Sep 15, 1998 at 10:38:31PM -0400
Of course its not much different then being at most of the public exchange points,
with the majority being on the east and west coasts. The goal in my mine in doing
private peering is to get the traffic to and from the consumer at a faster and
less lossy rate. By expanding the amount of peering places you can better achieve
this.
On Tue, Sep 15, 1998 at 10:38:31PM -0400, Jon Zeeff wrote:
>
> With only two egress points you generally can't get all that close to
> the destination. Adding more points would mean less byte miles for BBN.
>
--
Steven O. Noble -- Sr. Backbone Engineer, Exodus Communications (EXDS)
-- Work:408.346.2333 --
All my love to the Canadian Mooing Frog.
