[194968] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Vendors spamming NANOG attendees
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Rodney Joffe)
Wed Jun 14 09:43:51 2017
X-Original-To: nanog@nanog.org
From: Rodney Joffe <rjoffe@centergate.com>
In-Reply-To: <C8C87C8F-015E-4EA5-B5A6-EF228C014465@taho.fr>
Date: Wed, 14 Jun 2017 06:43:45 -0700
To: Ge Dupin <gdupin@taho.fr>
Cc: NANOG <nanog@nanog.org>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces@nanog.org
I guess that explains why so many newcomers are confused about what spam is.=
=20
> On Jun 14, 2017, at 5:33 AM, Ge Dupin <gdupin@taho.fr> wrote:
>=20
> It looks like there are more spams coming from these discussions than from=
the original Scams/Spams..
> Ge
>=20
>>> Le 14 juin 2017 =C3=A0 14:26, Rodney Joffe <rjoffe@centergate.com> a =C3=
=A9crit :
>>>=20
>>>=20
>>>=20
>>> On Jun 13, 2017, at 10:28 PM, Mel Beckman <mel@beckman.org> wrote:
>>>=20
>>> But as I said, harvesting emails is not illegal under can spam. And the r=
equirement to not send you UCE to harvested emails is pointless, because how=
do you prove that someone did that?
>>>=20
>> Because he said so?
>>=20
>>>>>> The spammer had the balls to say, in his email:
>>>>>>=20
>>>>>>>=20
>>>>>>> We do not know each other. I'm leveraging the attendee list for NANO=
G to reach out and raise awareness of the value of OCS (Optical Circuit Swit=
ching) in the data center and in particular, the Carrier Neutral Hotel where=
we've been active with next generation MeetMeRoom discussions.
>>=20
>>=20
>=20
