[194882] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: NANOG 70 network diagram and upstream
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Andrew Conrad)
Tue Jun 6 19:22:07 2017
X-Original-To: nanog@nanog.org
From: Andrew Conrad <drevlan@outlook.com>
To: Eric Kuhnke <eric.kuhnke@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 6 Jun 2017 18:54:08 +0000
In-Reply-To: <CAB69EHhw4fry=0Tv+iPTn7CH9vfN9VnrXh1zmQwRL5UeR655Qg@mail.gmail.com>
Cc: "nanog@nanog.org list" <nanog@nanog.org>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces@nanog.org
Looks like the network diagram was updated and they ended up with just 2x 1=
0Gb circuits from Wave. I guess the 100Gb connections and redundant carrier=
s fell through?
--Andrew=20
> On Jun 4, 2017, at 5:33 PM, Eric Kuhnke <eric.kuhnke@gmail.com> wrote:
>=20
> Doesn't cost a lot to use the regional shelf spares stocked by Juniper fo=
r
> a couple of days...
>=20
> On Jun 4, 2017 4:03 PM, "James Breeden" <James@arenalgroup.co> wrote:
>=20
>> Yeah, I was wondering about that 4x100G. is that a necessity or a "becau=
se
>> we can" move?
>>=20
>>=20
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: NANOG [mailto:nanog-bounces@nanog.org] On Behalf Of Eric Dugas
>> Sent: Friday, June 2, 2017 4:35 PM
>> To: Aaron Gould <aaron1@gvtc.com>
>> Cc: NANOG <nanog@nanog.org>
>> Subject: RE: NANOG 70 network diagram and upstream
>>=20
>> And the 4x100G. That's four times the capacity of the network I work for=
.
>> ~100k subs.
>>=20
>>> On Jun 2, 2017 16:54, "Aaron Gould" <aaron1@gvtc.com> wrote:
>>>=20
>>> Btw....
>>>=20
>>> Wow, a ~2 million dollar boundary (dual PTX1000's) for the NANOG 70
>>> conference.... geez
>>>=20
>>> -aaron
>>>=20
>>> -----Original Message-----
>>> From: NANOG [mailto:nanog-bounces@nanog.org] On Behalf Of Eric Kuhnke
>>> Sent: Friday, June 2, 2017 1:43 PM
>>> To: nanog@nanog.org list <nanog@nanog.org>
>>> Subject: NANOG 70 network diagram and upstream
>>>=20
>>> Just a small thing, but as one of the folks who used to work on the
>>> core network gear of AS11404, the network diagram has something in it
>>> that might confuse attendees as to who is really sponsoring the upstrea=
m:
>>>=20
>>> https://www.nanog.org/meetings/nanog70/diagram
>>>=20
>>> AS11404 was formerly known as Spectrum Networks, acquired in 2013 by
>>> Wavedivision Holdings LLC (Wave Broadband) and became the backbone of
>>> the Wave network. It's a totally different thing than the Charter
>>> service which is trademarked as as Spectrum.
>>>=20
>>> https://www.peeringdb.com/asn/11404
>>>=20
>>> The logo in the right side bubble there shouldn't be the
>>> Charter/Spectrum trademarked font, but rather should be Wave, who
>>> built the dark fiber into the hotel and are providing the upstream.
>>> The last mile fiber into the hotel is Wave.
>>>=20
>>>=20
>>> -Eric
>>>=20
>>>=20
>>=20
