|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| home | help | back | first | fref | pref | prev | next | nref | lref | last | post |
X-Original-To: nanog@nanog.org Date: Wed, 17 May 2017 12:43:48 +1000 From: Matt Palmer <mpalmer@hezmatt.org> To: nanog@nanog.org In-Reply-To: <47461.1494979961@turing-police.cc.vt.edu> Errors-To: nanog-bounces@nanog.org On Tue, May 16, 2017 at 08:12:41PM -0400, valdis.kletnieks@vt.edu wrote: > On Tue, 16 May 2017 16:41:36 -0600, "Keith Medcalf" said: > > Of course Microsoft knew, since they wrote in the backdoor in the first > > place. That is why when informed by their employers that the backdoor = was > > going to be made public, they could undo the changes they had introduce= d so > > rapidly. >=20 > Do you have any actual evidence or citations that in fact, this was an > intentionally inserted backdoor? You'll have to speak up, he can't hear you over the rustling of the tin foil. - Matt
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| home | help | back | first | fref | pref | prev | next | nref | lref | last | post |