[194481] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Financial services BGP hijack last week?
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Compton, Rich A)
Tue May 2 11:24:29 2017
X-Original-To: nanog@nanog.org
From: "Compton, Rich A" <Rich.Compton@charter.com>
To: Job Snijders <job@ntt.net>, Nikos Leontsinis <nikosietf@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 2 May 2017 15:21:11 +0000
In-Reply-To: <20170502122729.ogun2nvu47i5sqvh@Vurt.local>
Cc: "nanog@nanog.org" <nanog@nanog.org>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
That=B9s the million dollar question. I think that there will be more
adoption from the Internet at large when some big players adopt it. Right
now the use of rsync in RPKI is preventing a lot of large ISPs from
implementing it (too difficult to provide redundancy with rsync). There is
a protocol called RPKI Repository Delta Protocol (RRDP)
https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-sidr-delta-protocol-08 which will
alleviate these concerns but it is still in draft. I think once that
becomes an RFC we will see more adoption of RPKI.
Rich Compton | Principal Eng | 314.596.2828
14810 Grasslands Dr, Englewood, CO 80112
On 5/2/17, 6:27 AM, "NANOG on behalf of Job Snijders"
<nanog-bounces@nanog.org on behalf of job@ntt.net> wrote:
>On Tue, May 02, 2017 at 08:29:32AM +0100, Nikos Leontsinis wrote:
>> it only proves the need for wider RPKI adoption....
>
>How can we actually encourage RPKI adoption?
>
>Kind regards,
>
>Job
E-MAIL CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: =
The contents of this e-mail message and any attachments are intended solely=
for the addressee(s) and may contain confidential and/or legally privilege=
d information. If you are not the intended recipient of this message or if =
this message has been addressed to you in error, please immediately alert t=
he sender by reply e-mail and then delete this message and any attachments.=
If you are not the intended recipient, you are notified that any use, diss=
emination, distribution, copying, or storage of this message or any attachm=
ent is strictly prohibited.
