[194172] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: BGP Route Reflector - Route Server, Router, etc
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Saku Ytti)
Mon Mar 20 17:47:31 2017
X-Original-To: nanog@nanog.org
In-Reply-To: <CAAWx_pWWXiJ9H72fcj6B08xsR_=mYWtXi_j=+YKS7cC-K+6oKA@mail.gmail.com>
From: Saku Ytti <saku@ytti.fi>
Date: Mon, 20 Mar 2017 23:46:24 +0200
To: James Bensley <jwbensley@gmail.com>
Cc: "nanog@nanog.org" <nanog@nanog.org>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
On 20 March 2017 at 18:59, James Bensley <jwbensley@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Mark is spot on, this is an important point. We just added ORR to SR OS
>> 15.0.R1 on the 7x50/VSR.
>
> Yes, which means we all know what we have do to. Everyone needs to
> join in to increase the pressure.
When talking to your vendors, ask what they do with ORR+ADD_PATH 2.
Obviously desired behaviour is to advertise 1st and 2nd best from ORR
POV.
If you need ORR, you're clearly moving to out-of-path reflection,
which is great. But you probably want that ADD_PATH 2, to retain
full-mesh like convergence times.
--
++ytti
