[193989] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: google ipv6 routes via cogent
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Marty Strong via NANOG)
Wed Mar 8 04:29:16 2017
X-Original-To: nanog@nanog.org
In-Reply-To: <20170308071801.ux6ac2tzrrrqfn7x@mew.swordarmor.fr>
Date: Wed, 8 Mar 2017 09:29:11 +0000
To: Alarig Le Lay <alarig@swordarmor.fr>
From: Marty Strong via NANOG <nanog@nanog.org>
Reply-To: Marty Strong <marty@cloudflare.com>
Cc: nanog@nanog.org
Errors-To: nanog-bounces@nanog.org
I wouldn=E2=80=99t be surprised if that=E2=80=99s unwanted, where =
Telstra domestic is announcing to Telstra International, who in turn =
announces to Cogent.
Regards,
Marty Strong
--------------------------------------
Cloudflare - AS13335
Network Engineer
marty@cloudflare.com
+44 7584 906 055
smartflare (Skype)
https://www.peeringdb.com/asn/13335
> On 8 Mar 2017, at 07:18, Alarig Le Lay <alarig@swordarmor.fr> wrote:
>=20
> On sam. 25 f=C3=A9vr. 09:49:56 2017, Aaron wrote:
>> Hi, I'm new to the nanog list, hope this isn't out of scope for what =
is
>> usually discussed here.
>>=20
>>=20
>>=20
>> Cogent is telling me that I can't route through cogent to get to =
google ipv6
>> routes (particularly the well known dns addresses =
2001:4860:4860::88xx)
>> because google decided not to advertise those route to one of their =
mutual
>> peers.
>>=20
>>=20
>>=20
>> Anyone know anything about this ? .and why it happened and when it =
will be
>> resolved ?
>>=20
>>=20
>>=20
>> -Aaron
>=20
> Hi,
>=20
> Since this morning, I see again google routes from cogent:
> https://paste.swordarmor.fr/raw/wnFQ
>=20
> But, with very bad latency. To go from Rennes (France) to Frankfurt
> (Germany), it transits via Sydney, and still thought other ASes:
> https://paste.swordarmor.fr/raw/PlSM
>=20
> --=20
> alarig
